Loyal readers of ELVISNIXON saw that the "mainstream" media was wrong. They are wrong on cultural issues, they are wrong on politics and they are even wrong on sports.

The New Orleans Saints were underdogs to the Colts, a team that had won the Super Bowl three years earlier. The Colts featured the unflappable, four-time NFL most valuable player Peyton Manning, who was raised in New Orleans. The Saint's Drew Brees was considered a diminutive overachiever. The reasons for the "mainstream" media to pick the Colts over the Saints by 5 points and as many as 17 are self evident.

But along their road to the championship, the Saints became the first team to defeat three quarterbacks who previously won Super Bowls (Arizona's great Kurt Warner, Favre and Manning).

Elvisnixon readers got the prediction Saints 37 Colts 21Final score?

Saints 31 Colts 17

Elvisnixon wins- Liberal media loses, once again

The Los Angeles Times ran a breaking story that characterized a group who object to Tim Tebow having been born. They feel it would be better had he been killed. Think this is a sick joke? Well, it is certainly sick, but tragically it is no joke. The conclusion is inescapable.

Tim and his Mother are to be in a Super Bowl ad presenting the facts surrounding his birth.

The group objects to the fact that Tim Tebow was born.

What the Times calls a "women's group" is in fact a pack of anti-Christian zealots.Their rabid support for killing unborn babies in the womb is so extreme that they are calling for censorship of a commercial in which Tebow expresses thanks that his Mother chose not to abort him.

"An ad that uses sports to divide rather than to unite has no place in the biggest national sports event of the year -- an event designed to bring Americans together," said Jehmu Greene, president of the Women's Media Center.The center was coordinating the protest with backing from the National Organization for Women, the Feminist Majority and other groups. She is in favor of censorship. Why? The answer: because the pro-abortion argument survives only when it remains unchallenged. That is their concern. To them, the pro-life cause has no place anywhere, let alone the most-watched commercial stage.

Is it not interesting that a so-called women's rights leader defines an anti-abortion message as dividing us. Apparently a pro-abortion message unites us?

These so-called "womens groups" do not represent women; they represent special interests who profit from the abortion industry and subsidies from the Obama administration.

Tim Tebow has won both the Heisman Trophy and the National Championship of college football (twice)with his Florida Gators team, but Tim Tebow is much more than a football star.  Tim Tebow represents all that people like Jehmu Greene despises. Tim Tebow is a born-again Christian who is unapologetic about his faith.

He spends his free time serving in orphanages in third world countries, orphanages that are filled with children whom people like Jehmu Greene wishes were killed off before they were born.

The L.A Times states that ad was paid for by what they call the "conservative Christian" (why never call a group "atheist Leftist"?) group Focus on the Family is expected to recount the story of Pam Tebow's pregnancy in 1987.  After getting sick during a mission trip to the Philippines, she ignored a recommendation by doctors to abort her fifth child and gave birth to Tim, who went on to win the 2007 Heisman Trophy while helping his Florida team to two BCS championships.

Tim Tebow serves the helpless, the poor and the forgotten.
 
Jehmu Greene is a person represents identity politics. Her biography is filled with terms like  "diversity", "urban", "green", "activism", "pop culture", "coalition", "meaningful way" and other key terms that are designed to pit one group against another. She has never represented American citizens -- only select groups that she tries to give an advantage to, over all others. She is a major proponent of all sorts of hateful language against Christians, the Tea Party movement and others.

These groups who constantly accuse Christians and conservatives of being narrow minded are seeking to censor a commercial on national television. Their howls for censorship betray the truth about these jackals.

The time to act is now. If you are for freedom of speech, freedom of religion, human life or just respect the American virtue of the right to disagree please spread the word. We need everyone who can to contact CBS now and encourage them to stand up to this anti-American pressure.

As for me, if they decide to cancel the commercial, I will not watch the Superbowl, nor anything else on CBS. If they cancel, it is a clear message to me as a pro-lifer that my patronage of their network is unappreciated. That, however, won't be in my message to them. They are planning on running it as of right now, and they don't need threats. They just need some backbone reinforcement. Thanks and admiration will do just fine.

Timeliness is important. I'm sure there is support within the network for dropping the ad, and that contingent won't give up. Some support right now might help keep this ad in its prime-time location.

The underdog New Orleans Saints shall triumph over Peyton Manning and the Colts.

Reggie Bush will have his career defining game.

Saints 37 Colts 21

You heard it from Elvisnixon!

As usual, the mainstream media is presenting the debate about "Don't Ask Don't Tell" as a non issue and portraying any objections as the ideas of "bigots and het pigs" (as heterosexuals are called in the Castro District of San Francisco)

Of course, this is a misdirection strategy because once the homosexuals are admitted, their practices will have to be "normed" and force normal soldiers into "sensitivity training" for objecting to the unwanted advances of homosexuals. The "bathroom sex culture" of homosexuals that resulted in AIDS will become as "normal" as the wiccan movement at the Air Force Academy, which has captured headlines lately.
 
The goal of ending the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy (instituted after Clinton attempted this in the early 1990s) is not to allow homosexuals to serve in the military. The goal is to get them in and then engage in social engineering much the same as forcing Harvey Milk Day on kindergardeners and punishing 6-year-olds in Alameda who disagree with school indoctrination such as theBoy In The Bikini. An example of the 'spin" by the managed media is NPR's interview with Representative DUNCAN HUNTER (Republican, California):

BLOCK: You are not in favor of a repeal of don't ask, don't tell. Why not?

Rep. HUNTER: No, because I think that its bad for the cohesiveness and the unity of the military units, especially those that are in close combat, that are in close quarters in country right now. Its not the time to do it. I think its - the military is not civilian life. And I think the folks who have been in the military that have been in these very close situations with each other, there has to be a special bond there. And I think that bond is broken if you open up the military to transgenders, to hermaphrodites, to gays and lesbians.

BLOCK: Transgenders and hermaphrodites.

Rep. HUNTER: Yeah, that's going to be part of this whole thing. Its not just gays and lesbians. Its a whole gay, lesbian, transgender, bisexual community. If you're going to let anybody no matter what preference - what sexual preference they have that means the military is going to probably let everybody in. Its going to be like civilian life and the I think that that would be detrimental for the military.

BLOCK: Was there anything in your experience with the military in Afghanistan and Iraq that made you think that unit cohesion would be a real issue if gays and lesbians who, I think we can acknowledge, are serving in the military now, just not openly, were to be open about their sexual orientation?

Rep. HUNTER: Yeah, I think that the majority of people in the military are they're young kids. They usually have more conservative families, more conservative backgrounds and I think that it would go against their principles and it would frankly make everybody a little bit uneasy to be in these close situations, how you go into combat, you know, the shower situation, the bathroom situation, just, you know, very mundane details - things that we have men and women separated, you know, because we don't want to have that sexual distraction. That exists for the homosexual aspect of things, too.

BLOCK: But Congressman Hunter, wouldn't you agree that there are gays and lesbians serving in the military right now, they just are not open about their orientation. So the problems that you raise presumably would be problems already. They are in the barracks already. They are in the showers already.

Rep. HUNTER: No, but they aren't open about it, like you just said. It's like if you want to work for NPR, you don't go to work and on the first day say, hey, I want everybody to know that I'm gay. You probably don't care one way or the other as long as they, you know, get their particular job done. I think the military is the same way. Thats why don't ask, don't tell works.

BLOCK: Admiral Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said today in the Senate hearing that hes talked to counterparts in other countries where they do allow gays to serve openly in the military, and there has been no impact, he says, on military effectiveness. What do you think about that?

Rep. HUNTER: Let me answer with this too. Admiral Mullen is the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, a political appointee. And thats fine, he has his opinion. But his opinion is not necessarily that of the chief of staff of the Army or the Marine Corp commandant. But I would say in answer to your particular question, the U.S. is not Canada and were not Great Britain and I would argue that we have a superior military and a much larger military than any other country....

BLOCK: Congressman Hunter...Do you think the climate has really shifted on this since Congress took it up back in 1993 and that the times have changed?

Rep. HUNTER: Maybe civilian-wise it has. But I can show you polls that are inter-military polls that show they haven't changed. In this study that Secretary Gates set up for one year, were going to find out what the Marine Corp commandant thinks. Were going to see what General Casey and the Army thinks. Were going to see what the, you know, from private first classes in Marine force recon to Army rangers, were going to see what they think about this and I think that will be quite telling."

Did you catch the subtext? The goal is to CHANGE the military from a conservative group with Christian or at least traditional values and expose them to the "gay" agenda. Is this is what Obama's "Change" propaganda was all about?

Back in November the Washington Times reported:

"Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James T. Conway has emerged in internal Pentagon deliberations as the most outspoken opponent of permitting gay men and women to serve openly in the U.S. military, according to a former senior Pentagon official.

Most of the senior brass hold deep reservations about President Obama’s pledge to end the ban on gays in the military, especially in the middle of two wars that have put extra stress on the military, down to the platoon level, where soldiers and Marines would be expected to bond with openly gay colleagues.

But Gen. Conway has gone further than others in stating his opposition to a change in policy, according to the former official, who has been privy to private conversations on the matter. “He feels very strongly that [removing the ban] would be disruptive, and he opposes it,” said the former official.

Gen. Conway’s private remarks stand in contrast to public utterances by other service chiefs, who have restricted themselves to repeating a well-rehearsed mantra: If Congress introduces a bill to repeal the ban, they will discuss it with the chain of command. If Congress changes the law, they will follow the law.

Gen. Conway is the only chief known to have actively surveyed his generals on the impact of removing the ban. Gen. Conway’s four-year term ends in November 2010."

So, as usual, our liberal media are lying to us. The people who actually fight and bleed for us do not want homosexual indoctrination added to boot camp. New York/Hollywood types despise the military and rarely, if ever, meet anyone who has actually served and yet they want to turn the armed forces into yet another petri dish for social experimentation, in the same way that they have destroyed the public school system.

Once our Presidents actually cared about the American people:

 May 13, 1971, President Richard Nixon:

It is a truth that genuine art reflects reality. It is also true that art has a timeless element . William Hogarth created many works of art that can be characterized as masterpieces (unlike the taxpayer funded NEA "art" such as a crucifix in urine or homosexual Robert Mapplethorpe engaging in unspeakable acts of a scatological nature).

William Hogarth exposed the lies and hypocrisy of his times.

A man like Hogarth is desperately today when SEIU and ACORN stand to make millions of dollars based on their donations to Mr. Obama.

A man like Hogarth is needed now that we are on the cusp of Al Franken and Arlen Specter taking over one sixth of the US economy. Does anyone genuinely believe that a clown like Franken will be able to administer healthcare in any way other than a radical Left- wing agenda?

Art is needed as a mirror and can be used to help us see the falsehood that our corporate managed media spoon feeds us.

Hogarth's painting (below) is a study in cupidity, greed and avarice. It critiques political corruption in Hogarth's England.  Instead of the Dickensian Englishmen, picture the faces of Rahm Emmanuel, David Axelrod, Michelle and Barack and Bill and Hillary.  They fit in perfectly.

Our local news is continuing its outrageous propaganda campaign by hiding the facts of a cop killer. Their unrelenting drumbeat of hatred against U.S. citizens requires us to research these incendiary statements for ourselves.

Deputy David March was murdered by an illegal alien drug dealer. Our local news omitted important facts of this outrageous story because of the same suicidal attitudes of political correctness that allowed jihadi Nidal Hasan to commit murder while an officer in the U.S. Army. No news coverage was given about the murder of an American peace officer, but major coverage was given to the out of context remarks by Santa Clarita Councilman Bob Kellar, a veteran councilman who has twice served as the city’s mayor,

Bob Kellar had dared to speak out against the crimes of the illegal alien "community." At a Jan. 16 anti-illegal immigration rally in Santa Clarita, Kellar referred to a statement made by President Theodore Roosevelt, noting that the United States has a place for only one flag and one language. Kellar said those remarks caused some people to accuse him of being racist, to which he replied that if believing in America causes people to believe that he is racist, “then I’m a proud racist.” I wish all councilmen in every city in the country would stand up for the law, as Kellar has.

It never ceases to amaze me that whenever a person speaks intelligently about the subject of illegal immigration, he is branded a racist. It seems to me that when the Left lacks intelligent arguments on the subject, it always falls back on that old canard. "Chato" Garcia, first shot Officer March in broad daylight in the chest, under his armpit, and finished him with a fatal gunshot wound to his head and yet we are afraid of hurting the feelings of these illegal alien criminals who have no right to be here in the first place.

After the media widely misrepresented his statements as if he were stating that he is a "proud racist" and that was the entirety of his remarks, there was a firestorm of Leftist outrage at the out of context hyperbole. Those who live in his community know better. The mother of murdered Police Officer David March came out boldly in support of Kellar as well as hundreds of others who packed the city’s council chambers to praise him for speaking out on an issue many residents find frustrating. Kellar, unlike the illegal alien murderer/drug dealer, is a U.S. Army veteran who served 25 years with the Los Angeles Police Department. Kellar told attendees at Tuesday’s meeting that he was a proud American who was critical of the failure of the federal government to tackle illegal immigration, which burdens the nation.

“Illegal immigration is a problem for all Americans, and we need to do our part to address it,” Kellar said. “If we are to remain a nation of laws, we must respect those laws.”

Let's review: Illegal alien Garcia boasted ( in espanol) of killing Deputy March . He had previously vowed to kill any police officer who tried to arrest him.Illegal alien Garcia fled to Mexico within hours of killing Deputy March and would still be hiding there except for his hubris and dedicated law enforcement work that captured the Mexican national. Nothing was said about this by (illegal) "Immigrants Rights" groups nor the news media but they did give prominence to the complaints of the illegal aliens.

Of course our local CBS, NBC and ABC affiliates did not cover the cop killer angle of the story, nor did they mention the enormous outpouring of support for Kellar at the council meeting. They chose to cover a radical Mexican group led by Juan Jose Gutierrez, demanding that Kellar be fired and that no apology would be accepted. Members of theFull Rights for Immigrants Coalition, and other illegal-immigrant support groups, held signs saying “Fire ‘proud racist’ Bob Keller (sic) now!”

The good news? Bob Kellar refused to apologize.

Mother Of Murdered Deputy March Speaks Out

AKA: Race: Eyes: Hair: DOB: Height: Weight: Tattoo:   Other Info:		Armando Garcia Male Hispanic Brown Black Nov 3, 1976 5'7" - 5'9" 195 - 230 Back Shoulder "Garcia." Unknown tattoo on upper arm. Short black hair, combed back, dark complexion, mustache

http://new.wehategringos.com/?page_id=881

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (his real name is "Tony Villar"- that was what he was known as in his days as a student radical at UCLA) put on a shameful display of stooped walking and "jive" talking at Black History presentation at City Hall over the weekend.

The mayor was "honoring" Chaka Khan and Jamie Foxx by putting on an Amos and Andy drawl that dredged up the worst stereotypes of Black speech patterns, what Democrat Harry Reid calls "Negro Dialect." Only his failure to mention fried chicken and watermelon was absent. The Mayor (who is Mexican) casually mentioned how he "sho'nuff gwan go to da BET" awards and how he "luvs him sum" Black folk. He went on to call Jamie Fox a "brotha" and do a pitiful attempt at George Jefferson meets Steppin Fetchit. His "house Negro" inanity was so stunning that many in attendance shuddered in horror. According to Michael Linder:
"Audience reaction ranged from giggles to amazement. Hundreds of African Americans who packed Council chambers or watched video projections on City Hall’s south lawn seemed slightly startled as hizzoner rapped on — not shuckin’ or jivin’ as much with Tavis Smiley as he did with entertainers Kahn and Foxx. LA’s mainstream media took no notice.Younger blacks seemed more amused than their civil rights-era elders or those from the Afro-centric generations of the 70s and 80s.But imagine the reaction had former mayors Jim Hahn or Dick Riordan lapsed into Ebonics at a celebration of black achievement..."

Speaking of Chaka Khan, Villaraigosa, assuming a mock "Negro" voice reminiscent of a slave from the miniseries Roots, drawled out, "she's done received 10 Grammy awards everybody. And a BET lifetime achievement awode. By the way, I'm at the BET awards every year held here in Los Angeles."

Speaking of Jamie Foxx, who was at his side, the mayor said, "Is there anything Jamie Foxx can't do? Mannnn ... I love, I love that convosation we had in our office a few minutes ago. Because you know what -- don't think for the moment that this brother couldn't run for office."

In response, Jamie Foxx attempted to speak Mexican Spanish while the Mayor (who prefers to be called "alcalde" by his fellow Mexicans) interrupted with shouts of "right on! and "awwwww riyeet!"


This insensitive behavior is particularly galling in light of the fact that Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is a member of La Raza ("the Race"), a racist group that promotes a climate of hate against African Americans. His antics of "acting Black" are shameful and insensitive. Jamiel Shaw was MURDERED by an ILLEGAL ALIEN because Jamiel was Black. Special Order 40 and the "sanctuary city" movement favors criminal illegal Mexicans and gang bangers over Americans of all races.

As Alan Wall repoted in Frontpagemag.com:

IMAGINE THAT a former member of a racist, anti-American organization, who has never repudiated that organization, were running for mayor of one of America's largest cities. Wouldn't that be considered a major scandal? Wouldn't such a politician be shunned by the mainstream, condemned in newspaper op-eds across the nation, and attacked for his past by his opponent?

Now imagine a second scenario. Imagine that a former member of a racist, anti-American organization, who has never repudiated that organization, were running for mayor of one of America's largest cities. But in this scenario, such a politician's past is largely ignored by the mainstream media and even by his opponent. Could such a thing be possible?

Yes, such a thing is possible and is in fact happening right now in Los Angeles, California...Antonio Villaraigosa, who in his college days was president of the UCLA chapter of MEChA.  Villaraigosa has refused to renounce his membership in the MEChA, and has even said he is proud to have been part of the group. Villaraigosa's past is being ignored by the LA Times, the LA Daily News.

MEChA is an acronym for "Movimiento Estudiantíl Chicano de Aztlán" - Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan. The goal of Aztlan is the secession of the Southwest U.S.A., which it calls Aztlan. The MEChA Constitution clearly calls for "the struggle for the self-determination of the Chicano people for the purpose of liberating Aztlán". Another key document , "El Plan de Aztlan", states that "Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. We do not recognize capricious frontiers on the bronze continent....We declare the independence of our mestizo nation...Nationalism as the key to organization transcends all religious, political, class, and economic factions or boundaries. Nationalism is the common denominator that all members of La Raza agree upon." The MEChA slogan "Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada" (Everything for the Race - Nothing oustside the Race) -what is that if not racism? According to Miguel Perez , mechista of Cal State Northridge, "The ultimate ideology is the liberation of Aztlan....Non-Chicanos would have to be expelled....opposition groups would have to be quashed because you have to keep the power."

Local news media, who would have lead the news with the racist behavior had this been Pat Buchanan or Ronald Reagan, were silent about the incident. This is understandable in light of their typical Leftist bias and the fact that the serial cheater has dated, and is dating, several news anchors.


This is not the first time a liberal politician has put on a minstrel show. Hillary Clinton affected a "Negro dialect" to great (unintended) comedic result. The clip featured below shows "Kentucky Fried Hillary" doing her best to sound like a recently emancipated slave from Gone With The Wind before a primarily Black audience.

I find it very interesting that Leftists in general, and some Black people, are willing to accept anything that a Democrat says even if it's demeaning or insulting. I know conservatives would be called a racist if  they tried to imitate Black speech.

These are the same people who evince an incredible sensitivity to the slightest inference of racial prejudice. Michelle Obama wrote her college thesis on the racist nature of white America. Van Jones, the "Reverend's" Jesse Jackson, Jeremiah Wright and Al Sharpton have all made millions off of white politicians bowing in apology for their "insensitive" ways. These shakedown artists share the same political views as people like Mayor Tony Villaraigosa and Hillary; therefore, they get a pass from the liberal media.

The shucking and jiving is a monstrous example of the double standards of she-male Rachel Maddow of the defunct Air America radio/MSNBC and other representative of the 'tolerant" Obama media as Los Angeles descends further into become a third world hellhole of anti Black/Anti American hatred.

L.A. Mayor "Honors" Black History Month with Dance?

 

 

In spite of the tropes of the managed media, a truly post-Christian America will be hell on earth.

Remember when the managed media expressed such outrage that Addison Graves Wilson, Sr., most commonly known as "Joe" Wilson, pointed out that Obama was lying when he said illegal aliens (actually Undocumented Democrats) would not receive free healthcare at taxpayer expense?

Obama lied then and he just keeps on lying.
 
From his latest State of the Union gabfest:

"Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections."

This is another lie. 

I wish Joe Wilson would have demanded the truth again.

In Southern California, a Riverside County school district has decided to remove the current dictionaries from the classrooms for kindergartners through fifth graders because they include the term "oral sex."  They will be replaced with age-appropriate ones, and district spokeswoman Betti Cadmus told the Press-Enterprise the reasoning behind the decision which is that the current dictionaries are ". . . just not age appropriate."  The dictionaries in question will be used in classrooms for students sixth grade and higher.

The Los Angeles Times online ran a short, inflmmatory article about the district's decision and sought reader feedback.  As expected, the responders equate the changing of the dictionary with a return to book burning and so-called "Puritanical" values.  The readers, the few who are left, bray on about the horrific "censorship" by the (evidently) backwords people of Riverside County.  Of course, these readers are correct; not wanting a seven-year-old to read about oral sex is worthy of hand-wringing, name-calling, and warnings against scary, evil Christians and Republicans.

The Los Angeles Times has been successful in stoking the Left-wing "outrage" over a non-story like this one.

Where was the L.A. Times and its legion of sympathetic, Liberal readers when parents objected to their elementary school children being shown graphic homosexual, "transgender" and transvestite propaganda with mandatory viewing of films such as The Boy In The Bikini? 

Parents who object to such indoctrination are publicly condemned by taxpayer funded "thought police" in schools and our court system. 

On December 1, 2009, a judge in Alameda, California slammed parents as “bigots” for seeking to excuse their elementary-age children from controversial pro-homosexual curriculum.  Instead of upholding the law found in the California Educational Code, he decided to tell these parents, and the court, his view is not only the correct one, but the only one allowed.  Out with the law, out with the First Amendment of the Constitution; in with a judge's feelings.

Pacific Justice Institute chief counsel Kevin Snider argued in Alameda Superior Court on behalf of parents seeking to enforce a provision of the California Education Code that gives parents the right to opt their kids out of health education. Alameda Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch lambasted the parents, repeatedly insinuating that they are bigots and insisting there can be no homosexual indoctrination because people are born that way. The judge equated a view contrary to his own with creationism and then called both false.

The legal battle over Alameda’s so-called "anti-bullying" curriculum, which focuses almost solely on homosexuality, has intensified in recent weeks. Attorneys for the school district grilled parents in depositions about their religious beliefs. Parents were asked numerous questions about church attendance, sermons they had heard against homosexuality, and whether they were aware that the Bible had allegedly been used to defend racism and oppression. The Times and its readers did not rush to defend the privacy and religious freedom of these parents.  On closer examination, such a non-reaction does make sense because the Left believe only their favored groups are allowed privacy (Marxists, "revolutionaries," Obama donors, and anyone wearing a Che shirt) and religious freedom (Muslims --preferably radical-- animists, witch doctors, and New Agers).

Chief Counsel Kevin Snider commented on the hearing:
“We believe that this ruling against parents is inconsistent with the Education Code, and we are looking forward to continuing this battle until opt-out rights are restored on appeal, or the curriculum is changed.” Snider emphasized that the parents who filed suit support comprehensive anti-bullying instruction; however, they oppose the current elementary curriculum that focuses almost exclusively on homosexuality. School records released by Alameda Unified School District show that bullying based on race and gender is far more prevalent in AUSD than sexual orientation harassment. "

Pacific Justice Institute President Brad Dacus stated, “Most parents do not want their first through fifth graders bombarded with pro-homosexual messages at school. If LGBT advocates really want to stop name-calling and bullying, they should start with themselves.”

Children are in greater moral, physical and spiritual danger than any time in our history. Democrats in Congress and the California legislature are trying to force public schools to celebrate such outrages as national "Gay Day" and California's pro-homosexual "Harvey Milk Day."

The Los Angeles Times, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and MSNBC somehow ignored this freedom-destroying decision by .
a California judge.

The L.A.Times spikes this story, but runs one about a change of dictionaries in a school district in California.  Sadly, such marginalization and distortion is to be expected from the Times. If the facts contradict their Leftist views, then they spike the story, as is the case with these parents not wanting their young kids force-fed homosexuality, transgenderism, and bisexuality. 

In another case of conveniently omitting information contradictory to their lock-step views, the L.A. Times did not reveal who the Chatsworth Metrolink driver was. They spiked the fact that the driver was a homosexual and who it was that the man whose partner died of AIDS was obsessively text messaging (under- age boys) when he killed about 30 innocent people.

Why does the Times insist on protecting certain favored groups (violent illegal aliens, homosexuals) and deriding, mocking and simply distorting facts to destroy those groups it opposes (such a Christians, Conservatives, Conservative-Christians etc.)?  What happened to dispassionate objectivity in journalism?