Her headline?:

That manages to capture the dangerous intransigence of the open borders crowd.

If we have a culture based on Christian ethics and a common agreement of morality, then these crimes would be aberrations and universally condemned.  Membership in the illegal alien community is predicated on violating the law of the host country. Their refusal to speak English and force their hosts to accommodate their refusal is representative of their hatred for us.

The L.A Times reported the inarticulate protests of one such person.  An ".. angry senior complained at a school board 'It wasn't nobody's fault,' she said. 'People shouldn't be pointing fingers.'"

A gang rape by illegal aliens is faultless? Only in government schools would anyone come to that conclusion.

The orthodox Left has an evil "logic" at play here.  If you do not want to grant the historical rights of Christian marriage of one man , one woman, then you "hate" homosexuals.

Those who not merely disagree but refuse to heartily endorse "gay" marriage are said to hate homosexuals and somehow are responsible for violence against them.

According to the Left  you must not only be silent regarding any moral objections that you may harbor regarding "gay" marriage, but you must actively celebrate "Harvey Milk Day" in schools that you pay for with your tax dollars!  No mention is allowed of anything Christian because that would be an endorsement of religion.  But you are compelled to pay for children being trained about how wonderful the San Francisco councilman was. ( Ann Coulter made another great quip when she observed that Gubernatorial loser Gavin Newsom "should not have performed all those "gay' marriages" - maybe the California majority still isn't buying the party line).

Why then is this logic not extended to criminal illegal aliens?  They are breaking the laws of the United States by their presence, by stealing social security numbers, by not paying taxes that we are compelled to pay.  They must , by definition, "hate" America and Americans by their refusal to adopt our culture and language.

The problem is that the fifth-columnist Left has enjoyed a long march through our cultural institutions (education, media, the arts, even sports).  Ask Larry Williams who lost over $600,000 for using a term for homosexuals that they do not care for.  They have even infiltrated traditional religion.  (See my earlier posts on ACORN being subsidized by mainline Christian denominations.)

Think ELVISNIXON exaggerates?  Ask yourself why writer/comedian and environmental extremist (an extremist for how YOU should behave; he gets to live in an enormous mansion, like Al Gore) is not running for his life as Christians seek to sever his head?  When someone completely blasphemes our religion and insults Christians to the core, Christians do not call for his death; we don't send out a world-wide fatwa; heck, we don't even picket his place of business until he loses his job, like the homosexuals did to a waitress in Los Angeles.  Her crime was not urinating on a picture of Bill Clinton or Elton John.  She gave a donation in support of traditional marriage.

Jamie Glazov makes the point that in a recent episode of Mr. David's execrable Curb Your Enthusiasm, he urinates on a picture of Jesus, and the ignorant Christians take it to mean that their Lord and Savior is "weeping" much to the hilarity of the sensitive progressives who adore Larry David.

"Those benighted ignoramuses! It's just urine!" howl the atheists and liberals. "What bravery by Larry David" they shout.

Mr. Glazov continues: "Are producers of this show, or Larry David, or anyone else connected to it fearing for their lives right now? Are there Christian groups calling for the death of anyone in connection to this episode?  In comparison, let us say, to the Muhammad cartoons riots and death threats, what does this say about Islam and Christianity?  Which faith is a Religion of Peace and which one is not?  Would the producers of this show have just as easily allowed a scene in which Larry David urinates on a Koran?"

He couldn't urinate on a picture of Muhammad because we all know doing so gets you an immediate death sentence. 

Question: Why in our culture is urinating on Jesus easily permitted but urinating on the Koran is simply unthinkable? What does this signify?

And why is it that the people who right now are rolling their eyes and saying that Christians should get a life because this is freedom of expression, the same ones who would be up in arms if Larry David had done the same thing to the Koran? They are the ones who blamed the artists of the Muhammad cartoons for provoking and upsetting Muslims. They are the ones who argue that, when it comes to the sensibilities of Muslims, free speech has limits.

If Curb Your Enthusiasm had an episode in which Larry David urinated on a Koran, they would be on the front lines saying that this is Islamophobia and that we must be sensitive to the feelings of Muslims.  It would be deemed as hate speech, maybe even a hate crime.  There would be lawsuits and the show would be canceled and David’s career would be over.  (See Glazov's article: http://newsrealblog.com/2009/10/29/would-Larry-David-urinate-on-a-Koran-by-Jamie-Glazov/) 

Christianity is truly a religion of peace and the hard left is a "religion" of hate.  The left is a religion that brands any who dare stand against its dogma as "hateful."

Is there a link? How can these children be so sick as to applaud and photograph a gang rape by illegal aliens?  Because they are illegal aliens and the children of illegal aliens and they are being raised in a culture of hatred against Christianity and the morality that protects the weak against this vicious.  The moral law is the ONLY law that is non-partisan.  The law of this world always favors the wealthy and the powerful (homosexuals, Liberals) and the many (illegal aliens). 

The cultural hegemony of the anti-Christian Larry David "humor" and the Obama administration are bearing fruit.

Very bitter fruit.