Don't Ask Obama, Don't Tell Obama: He Doesn't Care
In spite of the tropes of the managed media, a truly post-Christian America will be hell on earth.
Cartoonish depictions of a neo-fascist theocracy if Christian values reigned are prevalent in the discourse of doctrinaire Left-wingers such as Michelle Obama, homosexual radicals and Planned Parenthood.
The reality is that Christians provide support for the weak and those without a voice. The poor and the unborn are protected from exploitation and outright murder that would result if there was no pro-life movement. Homosexuals, in spite of their protests to the contrary, are far from an 'oppressed" minority. If anything they are over-represented in the arts and the media (seen a Tony Awards lately?)
What is the goal of the radical "gay" groups? The total acceptance of their lifestyle choice, which means reeducation and indoctrination from the earliest age.
Wherever they can, they lower the age of consent because of the goal of older men exploiting young boys. The legalization of prostitution and abuse of children inevitably follows. The outcry of the media against Roman Catholic child abuse has covered up the simple facts: only men can become priests, the vast majority of these men abuse boys (pederasty), and that is, by definition a homosexual act.
Drive around West Hollywood. Who is picking up the young runaway boys? Not women, but homosexual men whose physical beauty has faded and whose lust for idealized young male bodies creates a market for this immoral, sick abuse.
Why would our President give as the centerpiece of his State of the Union speech his goal of fully integrating homosexuals into our military?
Did you notice the faces of the generals and admirals in the audience: stony stoicism. Only a doctrinaire Leftist or a prostituted politician (Obama may be both) would argue that unit cohesion would be advanced by allowing predatory "gays" into the bathrooms, barracks and battlefields.
We are war, and Obama wants to pay off his liberal constituency with an act of dangerous social engineering.
This callous attitude is reminiscent in his dogmatic refusal to protect our citizens from a potential pandemic when swine flu was being carried across our southern border. Obama does not care about "the people." He cares about 'transforming America" into his vision of a multicultural, heathen haven for those willing to obey his whims.
Whenever this kind of hubristic policy has been followed, it results in genocide. National Socialist Germany, Soviet Socialist Russia, Mao's China all murdered millions in order to create a "heaven on earth," unfettered by the constraints of Christian morality.
Obama is not attempting to help a weak and powerless group. He is energetically attempting and end run around the will of the majority of Jewish, Christian and traditionally moral Americans. His proposal would force "sensitivity training" on our soldiers by a group with inordinate power. As pointed out in World magazine's coverage of the Prop 8 kangaroo court in California:
The defense team then worked to prove that homosexuals are not a powerless minority. Political scientist Kenneth Miller testified that gays and lesbians hold political power, noting that the “No on 8” campaign raised $43 million—$3 million more than “Yes on 8.” He said that gays and lesbians can count the Democratic Party, lawmakers (a “striking” number of supporters in the California legislature especially), newspapers, corporations, celebrities, and churches among their allies. Ironically, he listed Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger—technically a defendant in the case, although he supports same-sex marriage—as one of the group’s political allies. Of California’s largest newspapers, 21 of the 23 endorsed the “No on 8” campaign. California was the first state with a lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender legislative caucus, which has had eight members over the years. ."
Hardly a voiceless minority.
Obama is not attempting to help a weak and powerless group. He is energetically attempting and end run around the will of the majority of Jewish, Christian and traditionally moral Americans. His proposal would force "sensitivity training" on our soldiers by a group with inordinate power. As pointed out in World magazine's coverage of the Prop 8 kangaroo court in California:
The defense team then worked to prove that homosexuals are not a powerless minority. Political scientist Kenneth Miller testified that gays and lesbians hold political power, noting that the “No on 8” campaign raised $43 million—$3 million more than “Yes on 8.” He said that gays and lesbians can count the Democratic Party, lawmakers (a “striking” number of supporters in the California legislature especially), newspapers, corporations, celebrities, and churches among their allies. Ironically, he listed Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger—technically a defendant in the case, although he supports same-sex marriage—as one of the group’s political allies. Of California’s largest newspapers, 21 of the 23 endorsed the “No on 8” campaign. California was the first state with a lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender legislative caucus, which has had eight members over the years. ."
Hardly a voiceless minority.
When Obama said he's going to repeal the "don't ask don't tell" policy, NONE of the military sitting in the front row got up to clap or cheer...WHY?
Because they're not ignorant like Obama. The president knows "gays" can serve now in our military; they just can't be open about promoting their sexual preference and imposing a "bath house culture" on recruits. Prison is a great example of how Obama's policy works in action.
Will the U.S.A. become the land of the Obama-nation ?
Because they're not ignorant like Obama. The president knows "gays" can serve now in our military; they just can't be open about promoting their sexual preference and imposing a "bath house culture" on recruits. Prison is a great example of how Obama's policy works in action.
Will the U.S.A. become the land of the Obama-nation ?


The main thesis of the article is compromised by specious arguments.
Who are the people picking up young runaway girls on the streets, patronizing pimps who trade in underage girls, keep the sex trade in underage girls going worldwide?
Men.
Ommitting this extremely verifiable fact doesn't help your case. There are predatory men of hetero and homo sexual nature. Following your line of argument would exclulde all MEN from the military.
BTW, I am not a supporter of repealing DADT. Just making a strategic observation.
Reply to this
(CNSNews.com) - A special Defense Department working group appointed by Defense Secretary Robert Gates has recommended that the military should “expressly prohibit” heterosexuals from using separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities from homosexuals when the repeal of the law banning homosexuals from the military goes into effect.
The working group also has recommended that commanding officers be left with the authority to exempt individuals from using the same showers, bathrooms and living facilities as homosexuals, but only on a “case-by-case” basis.
The House voted earlier this week and the Senate voted this afternoon to repeal the military ban on homosexuals, which has often been referred to as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
The working group’s Nov. 30 report—“Report of the Comprehensive Review of the Issues Associated with a Repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’”--concluded that permitting heterosexuals to use separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities from homosexuals of the same gender would “stigmatize” homosexuals and be “reminiscent of ‘separate but equal’ facilities for blacks prior to the 1960s.” The working group was co-chaired by Jeh Charles Johnson, the Defense Department’s general counsel, and U.S. Army Gen. Carter F. Ham.
“In the course of our review we heard from a very large number of Service members about their discomfort with sharing bathroom facilities or living quarters with those they know to be gay or lesbian,” said the report. “Some went so far to suggest that a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell may even require separate bathroom and shower facilities for gay men and lesbians. We disagree, and recommend against separate facilities. Though many regard the very discussion of this topic as offensive, given the number of Service members who raised it, we are obliged to address it...”
Reply to this
Absolutely ridiculous.
First of all, Gays can commit murder. Just like straights. Therefore denial of Military Service on the basis of something that doesn't happen on the field of battle is just foolish, and another link in the Judeo-Christian Culture War on Americans. Get over it. It's done.
Second, this sentence "Cartoonish depictions of a neo-fascist theocracy if Christian values reigned are prevalent in the discourse of doctrinaire Left-wingers such as Michelle Obama, homosexual radicals and Planned Parenthood." Hilarious. You realize what you say in the second part of the sentence works as a cartoonish depiction of your faith-based prejudice? Really, ironic. I love it.
Also funny: The outcry of the media against Roman Catholic child abuse has covered up the simple facts: only men can become priests, the vast majority of these men abuse boys (pederasty), and that is, by definition a homosexual act.
Classic example of fallacy of equivocation. Yes, males who sexually abuse younger males are committing a homosexual act. But all homosexuals do not commit pedophilic acts. That's just a completely false, stupid claim. More than that, you claim that the majority of Priests are child abusers, which is false again. The percentage is actually very small, not even close to a majority of people who become Priests.
Also, National Socialist Germany, if you recall, was also the Third Reich, of the Holy Roman Empire, and it was kind of unified on an Ethnocentric Nationalist basis, including religion, i.e. Christianity. You see you can be a Christian Nation and still break your own rules. Look at the hundreds of years that Catholocism was run like a nation with a standing army by Warrior-Popes. Or consider the millions of people who have been executed as heathens since the advent of Christian Authority.
The difference between my stance and your stance is I'm not blaming all Christians for Nazi Germany, or the Spanish Inquisition, or Salem, or the Crusades, or any of that other business. I'm not blaming all Christians for the Conservative culture war that plots against happy little people like me every day.
You however are blaming all homosexuals for actions that have nothing to do with all homosexuals.
You're blaming me for something I've never done, had no part in. If it weren't for the news I would not even know such a thing existed.
Much like if I blamed you for, say, Ted Bundy, a heterosexual serial killer.
So let's compromise. You give up serial killing in advance, and I'll pre-emtively give up sexually abusing children.
Reply to this