ELVISNIXON.COM

Leftist Lies, Obfuscation and Paygrades

elvisnixon.com — Tue, 14 May 2013 15:43:11 GMT

There is a deep confusion in American politics.

This confusion is caused by the Left. Conservatives are regularly called "fascists" by those on the Left. Leftists change their name from "liberal" to "progressive." They also hide under the umbrella of "environmentalist" or crusaders for something called "social justice."

Voltaire famously said that he refused to debate until his opponent "defined his terms." The terms for Leftists listed above all share a common definition, common character traits. Generally, people on the Left like to tell other people what they ought to do. If they have enough power, they extend their suggestion of what someone ought to do to what they MUST do. They seem to love to compel someone else to act in accordance with their own priorities.

They deny the concept of truth, morality and universal standards. They then seek to impose their own opinions (they can be nothing more than mere opinion after all) on others.

Who else does this?

Fascists, communists, socialists, Leftists, progressives and Democrats all NEED government POWER, so they consistently champion the EXPANSION of government. I call it a family resemblance; those in the same family have shared characteristics.
Conservatives? Conservatives want less, not more, government and more personal responsibility. Conservatives believe government is necessary to protect "Life , Liberty and Property." They seek to protect these sacred things from everyone, particularly the leviathan state

Jonah Goldberg in his 2007 book Liberal Fascism points out the historical fact that Joseph Stalin, the brutal communist dictator and murderer, used the term "fascist" to condemn his fellow Left-wing Marxist Leon Trotsky. Yes, Trotsky the communist was called a "fascist." But so was anyone else who disagreed with any Soviet policy, including those who opposed the massive expansion of government power.

Today, conservatives who seek less government are called "fascists" (someone who believes in maximum government) by Leftists who have the same goals as fascists (more government, less freedom).

Confusing? Yes. The Left lies and distorts through a misleading use of "Left vs Right." Like Stalin, they use labels to silence and frighten. They call Focus on the Family "rabidly anti-gay," but no homosexual is ever called anti-heterosexual or anti-family. Obama is invariably called moderate, and any who dare question him are called extremists.

In order to get elected in the USA, Leftists must run as "moderates" and espouse conservative values, until they are elected and then the Leftist "wolf" takes off his sheepskin.

Remember Obama at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church? Candidate Obama said he opposed "gay" marriage. Last weekend he came out in favor of homosexual "marriage' and said that same-sex relations are morally laudable.

Candidate Obama said that the question of when life began was "above [his] pay grade." If that issue is beyond his understanding, then surely he should not seek to increase abortion funding to Planned Parenthood and mandate that all medical personnel be compelled to perform abortions even when their personal religious faith forbids it.

Perhaps, this should not surprise those who are paying attention. Nobody every accused the Left of believing in "thou shalt not bear false witness."

Pastor Jailed in Obama America

elvisnixon.com — Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:49:11 GMT

Pastor Gets 27 Months for Helping Ex-Lesbian and Daughter Flee Country

By Jerry A. Kane

Two days ago U.S. District Court Judge William Sessions III sentenced Mennonite pastor Kenneth Miller to 27 months for helping Lisa Miller (no relation) and her seven-year-old daughter, Isabella, flee the country in 2009 to prevent her former lesbian partner, Janet Jenkins, from taking custody of the child.

"The horror of this cannot be overstated."—William Sessions III, U.S. District Court Judge

Last August, Miller was found guilty of aiding in international parental kidnapping and has been locked up on a contempt-of-court charge since January 24 for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury seeking information about others who were involved in helping the mother and her biological daughter flee the country.

"I've already surrendered my freedom to Christ, and if this is the path he chooses for me, I will walk it. I am willing to accept the consequences. I am at peace with God. I am at peace with my conscience. I give it over to God."—Kenneth L. Miller, Mennonite pastor

Miller told Sessions that the idea of same-sex marriage offended his religious convictions and he helped the woman and her daughter get out of the country to keep the girl from being raised by Jenkins and exposed to her lesbian lifestyle.

"He didn't see her [Jenkins] as a human being. He saw her primarily as a homosexual associated with the powers of darkness,"—Christina Nolan, Assistant United States Attorney

At the end of Monday's hearing, Sessions dropped the contempt charges saying it was unlikely that more jail time would compel Miller to testify. The judge also agreed to put Miller's sentence on hold until the appeal process is finished. Miller plans to appeal his conviction on the grounds that the case was wrongly tried in Vermont because no part of the crime or its planning occurred in the state.

In 2000, Jenkins and Miller were living in Virginia and moved to Vermont to obtain a civil union. The couple separated, and Miller renounced her homosexuality. She returned to Virginia with Isabella.

In 2008, a Vermont court granted Jenkins unsupervised visitations with Isabella, but the court's visitation order was nullified by a Virginia judge after the state's ban on same-sex marriage took effect. The Virginia Court of Appeals then reversed the judge's ruling and ordered Miller to obey the Vermont court order. Miller refused to give Isabella to Jenkins for visitations.

In September 2009, the Mennonite pastor took Miller and Isabella by car from Virginia to Toronto, Canada, where the two boarded a flight for Central America to live with Mennonites in Nicaragua before the court could award Jenkins custody of the child.

In November 2009, a Vermont judge awarded Jenkins custody of the child.

The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 made it illegal to help fugitive slaves flee the country, yet some people ignored the law and put themselves in harm's way to help fugitive slaves travel the Underground Railroad into Canada and Mexico.

During World War Two, people from many countries ignored Nazi laws and risked their lives to help the Jews escape genocide. They did it because they believed it was their "moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws."

"An unjust law is no law at all." It inflicts harm and creates chaos. It tramples freedom of conscience and does the exact opposite of what a just law is meant to do.

"[A]n individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law."—Martin Luther King, Jr., "Letter from a Birmingham Jail"

Well done, Pastor Miller. Our Constitutional Republic could have been saved had more Americans possessed the courage of your convictions.

"No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority."—Thomas Jefferson

I.M. Kane

For more on the story, see Pastor Sentenced in Vt. Lesbian Custody Case, Vt. Court to Sentence Pastor for Helping Ex-Lesbian, Child Flee Country, and Up to 3 years sought in Vt. custody dispute.

What Changed?

elvisnixon.com — Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:36:19 GMT

"..Thus, the weird anomaly that in our interconnected globalist yada yada, white Southern Californians don't drive to Mexico anymore the way they did in the bad old days before we all learned that "diversity" is the most sacred word in the language..."

Steve Sailer

State of the Union: 2010-2013 What a Debacle!

elvisnixon.com — Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:05:28 GMT

On January 20, 2010 Massachusetts elected a Republican to the U.S. Senate, indeed to the same seat once held by Democrat “Lion of the Senate” Ted Kennedy—this after exactly one year of failed Obamanomics. The special election result amounted to a political earthquake, which shook the Democrat Party, gave the GOP some hope for prospects in November, and validated the populist grassroots nature of the Tea Party movement. On the policy front, Scott Brown’s election from the bluest state in New England had national implications: it stopped the healthcare/health insurance reform effort in its tracks, at least temporarily. Nobody but nobody likes the Senate or the House versions of the bill as currently proposed, as they appear loaded with everything but common sense.

One week later, however, the president delivered a surprisingly tough State of the Union Address. In his speech, he lectured the Republicans and bucked up the Democrats, but also rededicated himself and America supposedly to his entire Progressive agenda. Having thrown a 12 to 40 percent budget increase into various government agencies already, he decided that it is time to call for a spending freeze…uh, next year. The spending freeze of course won’t affect defense, Medicaid/Medicare or Social Security. Moreover, he wants to beat that freeze as it were, by spending hundreds of billions of dollars more for a “Jobs Bill” this year, which really amounts to a second stimulus bill called by another name. He also expressed his intent to end tax cuts put in place by President Bush, at the same time he promises punitive financial measures on banks, which aren’t lending very much now as it is.

The logic of all this causes one to scratch his head or else accept the obvious, which is that the measures the president proposes lead to economic ruin; to future generations being saddled—nay, more accurately bridled by debt; and to socialist despair and equal poverty for everyone. The president will either go down in history as the most economically devastating the nation has endured since Hoover, or else the people will respond to the political emergency and quite apart from handling any financial crisis, seal his fate in the election of 2012 as a one-term wonder.

Meanwhile the outlines of political debate are taking shape on the Republican side. Two important books will be released this spring, which present the major outlines of intellectual argument for what to do on the right. One or the other approach for the country (or perhaps some hybrid of the two) will guide organized opposition to the administration for the next three years and potentially set the parameters for governance in the future. If as expected the GOP rebounds in 2010 and 2012 and perhaps comes into majority, the importance of the intellectual debate this season becomes clear. Every citizen and certainly every Tea Party activist needs to become conversant in the dialog. Ideas truly do have consequences.

The first book is called Courage and Consequence by former top White House Aide Karl Rove. It is a memoir and, as might be expected, provides a vigorous defense of the George W. Bush/Dick Cheney years in office. More importantly, the book serves not only to justify its policies but also to rearticulate and repackage operative neoconservative governing principles and philosophy, which guided that Administration.

The second book is Bringing America Home: How America Lost Her Way and How We Can Find Our Way Back by Tom Pauken, who served on President Reagan’s White House staff and who is currently the Chairman of the Texas Workforce Commission appointed by Governor Perry. As the title reveals, his is a virtual point/counterpoint to Rove. Pauken rejects “Big Government Conservatism” and argues strenuously for return to limited government free market solutions, as well as to strict interpretation of the Constitution including its inherent structure of federalism and states rights. He rearticulates and repackages the traditional or paleoconservative governing principles and philosophy.

Rove takes a more elitist “subject matter expert” approach and never shies from implementing optimal solutions using the coercive power of the federal government; whereas, Pauken takes a discernibly grassroots approach, which in effect embraces and potentially co-opts the resurgent populist impulse characteristic of town hall meetings and tea party rallies since Obama tried to socialize America. All around the country in 2010, the Republicans are fighting a critical internal battle for the soul and future of that political party. The populist Jeffersonian type may seem to have an upper hand after the GOP’s electoral defeat in 2008, but neoconservatives are fighting an end-run to hold on to the levers of power and continue influence in the Republican Party until they can take advantage of the inevitable disenchantment with Obama. It may be that this debate in 2010 will determine more than anything what Republicans look like in 2012, with critical implications for the future of the country if Obama gets tossed out on his ear.

_____________________

Wesley Allen Riddle is a retired military officer with degrees and honors from West Point and Oxford. Widely published in the academic and opinion press, he ran for U.S. Congress (TX-District 31) in the 2004 Republican Primary. Email: wes@wesriddle.com

Obama's State of the Union: Love Islam/Hate Tea Party

elvisnixon.com — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:43:40 GMT

The most revealing quote from Obama’s speech was his jab at the Tea Party and other American patriots when he said, “And as extremists try to inspire acts of violence within our borders, we are responding with the strength of our communities, with respect for the rule of law, and with the conviction that American Muslims are a part of our American family.”

Pay close attention to this statement by "our" President. In the same sentence, he is attacking Americans as "extremists" who are inspiring acts of violence, while giving his violent Muslim allies a clean slate!

Why is our unbiased media not asking who is it that is disrupting traffic in Times Square, spitting on the American flag, lighting it on fire; and using every sort of hate-filled speech imaginable? It is not conservatives or theTEA Party. They are Muslims. And their goal is the destruction of our country. Yet, our Commander in Chief uses every opportunity to praise them

Bitter Fruit III: or Of Gang Rapes and Koran Urination

elvisnixon.com — Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:03:00 GMT

Ann Coulter has a post on her website (http://www.anncoulter.com/) that shows she came to the same conclusion ELVISNIXON has regarding the lesson to be learned from the horrific Richmond, California gang rape perpetrated by a government/public school full of illegal immigrants.

Her headline?:

Doing The Gang Rapes Americans Just Won't Do

That manages to capture the dangerous intransigence of the open borders crowd.

If we have a culture based on Christian ethics and a common agreement of morality, then these crimes would be aberrations and universally condemned. Membership in the illegal alien community is predicated on violating the law of the host country. Their refusal to speak English and force their hosts to accommodate their refusal is representative of their hatred for us.

The L.A Times reported the inarticulate protests of one such person. An ".. angry senior complained at a school board 'It wasn't nobody's fault,' she said. 'People shouldn't be pointing fingers.'"

A gang rape by illegal aliens is faultless? Only in government schools would anyone come to that conclusion.

The orthodox Left has an evil "logic" at play here. If you do not want to grant the historical rights of Christian marriage of one man , one woman, then you "hate" homosexuals.

Those who not merely disagree but refuse to heartily endorse "gay" marriage are said to hate homosexuals and somehow are responsible for violence against them.

According to the Left you must not only be silent regarding any moral objections that you may harbor regarding "gay" marriage, but you must actively celebrate "Harvey Milk Day" in schools that you pay for with your tax dollars! No mention is allowed of anything Christian because that would be an endorsement of religion. But you are compelled to pay for children being trained about how wonderful the San Francisco councilman was. ( Ann Coulter made another great quip when she observed that Gubernatorial loser Gavin Newsom "should not have performed all those "gay' marriages" - maybe the California majority still isn't buying the party line).

Why then is this logic not extended to criminal illegal aliens? They are breaking the laws of the United States by their presence, by stealing social security numbers, by not paying taxes that we are compelled to pay. They must , by definition, "hate" America and Americans by their refusal to adopt our culture and language.

The problem is that the fifth-columnist Left has enjoyed a long march through our cultural institutions (education, media, the arts, even sports). Ask Larry Williams who lost over $600,000 for using a term for homosexuals that they do not care for. They have even infiltrated traditional religion. (See my earlier posts on ACORN being subsidized by mainline Christian denominations.)

Think ELVISNIXON exaggerates? Ask yourself why writer/comedian and environmental extremist (an extremist for how YOU should behave; he gets to live in an enormous mansion, like Al Gore) is not running for his life as Christians seek to sever his head? When someone completely blasphemes our religion and insults Christians to the core, Christians do not call for his death; we don't send out a world-wide fatwa; heck, we don't even picket his place of business until he loses his job, like the homosexuals did to a waitress in Los Angeles. Her crime was not urinating on a picture of Bill Clinton or Elton John. She gave a donation in support of traditional marriage.

Would Larry David urinate on a Koran?http://newsrealblog.com/2009/10/29/would-Larry-David-urinate-on-a-Koran-by-Jamie-Glazov/

Jamie Glazov makes the point that in a recent episode of Mr. David's execrable Curb Your Enthusiasm, he urinates on a picture of Jesus, and the ignorant Christians take it to mean that their Lord and Savior is "weeping" much to the hilarity of the sensitive progressives who adore Larry David.

"Those benighted ignoramuses! It's just urine!" howl the atheists and liberals. "What bravery by Larry David" they shout.

Mr. Glazov continues: "Are producers of this show, or Larry David, or anyone else connected to it fearing for their lives right now? Are there Christian groups calling for the death of anyone in connection to this episode? In comparison, let us say, to the Muhammad cartoons riots and death threats, what does this say about Islam and Christianity? Which faith is a Religion of Peace and which one is not? Would the producers of this show have just as easily allowed a scene in which Larry David urinates on a Koran?"

He couldn't urinate on a picture of Muhammad because we all know doing so gets you an immediate death sentence.

Question: Why in our culture is urinating on Jesus easily permitted but urinating on the Koran is simply unthinkable? What does this signify?

And why is it that the people who right now are rolling their eyes and saying that Christians should get a life because this is freedom of expression, the same ones who would be up in arms if Larry David had done the same thing to the Koran? They are the ones who blamed the artists of the Muhammad cartoons for provoking and upsetting Muslims. They are the ones who argue that, when it comes to the sensibilities of Muslims, free speech has limits.

If Curb Your Enthusiasm had an episode in which Larry David urinated on a Koran, they would be on the front lines saying that this is Islamophobia and that we must be sensitive to the feelings of Muslims. It would be deemed as hate speech, maybe even a hate crime. There would be lawsuits and the show would be canceled and David’s career would be over. (See Glazov's article: http://newsrealblog.com/2009/10/29/would-Larry-David-urinate-on-a-Koran-by-Jamie-Glazov/)

Christianity is truly a religion of peace and the hard left is a "religion" of hate. The left is a religion that brands any who dare stand against its dogma as "hateful."

Is there a link? How can these children be so sick as to applaud and photograph a gang rape by illegal aliens? Because they are illegal aliens and the children of illegal aliens and they are being raised in a culture of hatred against Christianity and the morality that protects the weak against this vicious. The moral law is the ONLY law that is non-partisan. The law of this world always favors the wealthy and the powerful (homosexuals, Liberals) and the many (illegal aliens).

The cultural hegemony of the anti-Christian Larry David "humor" and the Obama administration are bearing fruit.

Very bitter fruit.

Bitter Fruit (Cont'd)

elvisnixon.com — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:00:00 GMT

Lest anyone say that the John and Ken Show's description of the horrific gang rape in Richmond, Ca as "ILLEGAL ALIEN CULTURE" was jumping to conclusions, I submit the following just in from the Los Angeles Times:

"Richmond police say 18-year-old Jose Carlos Montano was arrested about 5 p.m. Thursday outside his San Pablo home."

Jose Carlos Montano? Bringing more of that "vibrant" culture north of the border?

Thanks, Obama (and McCain, Bush, Lindsay Graham) and all you other open-borders fanatics.

Bitter Fruit

elvisnixon.com — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:47:56 GMT

The Los Angeles Times carried two disgusting and disturbing stories this morning. At first they may seem unrelated, but ELVISNIXON would argue that they are intrinsically linked.

"...National attention has been focused in Richmond (Northern California) over what police described as a gang rape of a 15-year-old student who struggled with attackers -- some of whom took photos and laughed -- as more than a dozen witnesses passed by and did nothing. Police said last night that as many as 20 people saw the attack, and some might have shot video on their cellphones.."

Think about it. That means that instead of using the phone to dial 911, the onlookers used them to celebrate the crime with a recording of the vile act.

Who raised these kids? Public Schools did. MTV did.

Manuel Ortega (19) and Salvador Rodriguez (21) shocked detectives because of their remorseless attitude. http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/10/28/hispanic-teen-gangrape-in-richmond-california/

Richmond High School is 78% Hispanic and only 2% white. Most parents of students have not graduated high school themselves and do not speak English.

What group does not speak English? Illegal Aliens.

The second story is, incredibly, even more disturbing than the first

"A convicted rapist pleaded guilty Tuesday to raping and murdering a 93-year-old woman more than 18 years ago, prosecutors said. Albert Rodriguez Salinas, 47, was already serving a three-year prison sentence for another rape when he was linked to the long-unsolved case though DNA evidence.."

Did you catch that? "..serving three years.."

THREE years?

How about life behind bars?

How about the death penalty?

How about public execution?

The man should never have been allowed into the United States to begin with? Why was he not deported?

The messages that are being sent by our system of "justice" is that these types of crimes are minor offenses. Three years?

Ever since the compromised science of demented "scientist" Alfred Kinsey promoted the notion that these bizarre behaviors were commonplace in post-war America (as if common decency was determined by consensus), our legal system severely decreased the penalties for these types of crimes.

This is the result of the 60's generation lowering all standards of decency and debasing our culture with moral relativism.

MTV constantly pumps raw sewage into the minds of these miscreants and "latch key" kids who are raised by public education to believe that there are NO moral absolutes.

You were not created and your origin is "from the goo, to the zoo, to you."

They are trained that you get to make it up as you go along.

Christians and Christianity are decreed verboten by the Obama's Public School "Czar" Kevin Jennings who approved of an adult male teacher having sex with a young boy and advised the boy to "use a condom." The "Safe Schools" Czar promotes "gay" marriage, and Tia Tequlia is seen as a role model.

John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou , hosts of the popular "John and Ken Show" on KFI AM-640 radio in Los Angeles, said on air yesterday that "this is illegal alien culture." This is not culture as Aristotle envisioned that term, this is anti culture. This is the bitter fruit of ANTI-Western Civilization indoctrination.

"Who are you to judge?" scream the intolerant bigots of the Left as they impose their sanctimonious dogma of moral relativism from above.

So the attitudes of the Obama administration with regards to illegal immigration combine with their elitist contempt for traditional, biblical morality, and what do we get?

Bitter fruit.

Racist Zoning Laws : A Primer

elvisnixon.com — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 07:02:00 GMT

The indefatigable Steve Sailer notices the unnoticeable once again at VDARE.com:

"Zoning laws regarding new construction are fanatically enforced where rich white liberals live (witness the struggles of George Lucas in Marin Country and The Edge in Malibu to build on their own land). But zoning laws regarding existing construction are much less enforced in adjacent areas where poor illegal immigrants live.

On paper, it's illegal to have six men sleeping in bunks in your garage in southeast Hollywood, but rich white liberals in Hancock Park want cheap servants, so the laws aren't enforced. But, just try to build in Hancock Park ..."

Expelling Christians: Why Thats OK with Katie Couric and Jon Stewart

elvisnixon.com — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:01:00 GMT

“A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when they lose their virtue they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader... If virtue and knowledge are diffused among the people, they will never be enslaved. This will be their great security” (Harry Alonzo Cushing, editor, The Writings of Samuel Adams [New York: G. P. Putnam’s, 1905], Vol. 4, p. 124).

MOROCCO REJECTS CRITICISM FOR EXPELLING CHRISTIANS

[Excerpts]The government of Morocco has launched a public relations effort to fend off criticism about its decision to expel 20 foreign Christian aid workers.... The expulsion order affected Christians who ran a center that has been taking in and fostering abandoned Moroccan children for 10 years.The group issued a statement denying the accusations, and describing the wrench of 33 children being forced to say goodbye, with no prior warning, to the only parents they had known.

On Thursday the government hosted a meeting of religious leaders - Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox and Jewish - who all then issued statements objecting to proselytizing, the act of seeking converts from other faiths. "Representatives of monotheistic religions in Morocco on Thursday reiterated that the kingdom is a land of tolerance, peace and religious freedom and rejected all forms of proselytism," the official Maghreb Arabe Presse (MAP) news agency reported. Interior Minister Taib Cherkaoui, who met with the religious figures, said the government was "thankful for their firm stand and their immediate condemnation of proselytism." The Russian Orthodox representative, Dmitry Orekhov, was quoted as saying, "We ourselves in Russia are facing the problem of proselytism and are willing to cooperate with Morocco to fight it." www.cnsnews.com/news/article/62681

The Orthodox representative (as well as the MSM and Obama etc..) is willing to coexist with anything except the biblical Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. His willingness to "fight" proselytizing includes no concern for the abandoned Muslim children.

Can You "connect the dots" between the Sam Adams quote and the deafening silence of our media elites regarding this gross injustice? Is it even imaginable that this would be buried had the persecution been of any other group? If Christians had done this to muslims,hindus,homosexuals or anyone else you would be hearing this on an hourly basis

The GOP Treason Lobby and Media's Mexican Hypocrisy

elvisnixon.com — Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:30:45 GMT

Allan Wall devastates the smoke and mirrors that the leftist propaganda machine of the Los Angeles Times and the local television stations are attempting to use to fool you into believing that Americans oppose the Arizona laws designed to protect us from illegal aliens:

According to a Rasmussen Reports telephone survey "70% of likely voters in Arizona approve of [SB 1070], while just 23% oppose it."

The essence of SB 1070 is revolutionary because it’s so simple—let Arizona’s police enforce the law, which the federal government has manifestly failed to do. As law professor Kris Kobach, who helped draft the legislation points out, SB 1070 only prohibits actions that, under federal law, are already illegal.

So what’s all the fuss?

But Mexico’s leaders have gone berserk, throwing a hissy-fit of massive proportions. Various Mexican political factions usually at loggerheads are now united in the lowest common denominator of Mexican politics—to keep the U.S. border open. (Though, as always, opposition politicians still fault the government of Mexico for not meddling more in U.S. internal affairs!)

And, ominously, they’re being joined by all the Hispanic organizations in the U.S.

Given Mexico’s own immigration policies, of course, this attitude is supremely hypocritical. For one thing, Mexican law requires that all Mexican police enforce its immigration law.

But the Mexican elite is right to fear SB 1070. [PDF]If it is successful, it is likely to inspire other states to follow suit. Then Mexico’s safety valve may be in danger and its leaders might actually (gasp!) have to figure out ways to create jobs for its own people, rather than dumping its poor on the U.S. welfare system.

Predictably, Mexican president Felipe Calderon condemned the law. Significantly, he was speaking to the council of the IME (Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior) a branch of the Mexican foreign ministry explicitly designed to organize Mexicans living in the United States.

Here’s what Calderon said [my translations throughout]:

"We are going to act, we are acting and we will act more. Nobody can stay with his arms crossed in the face of the decisions that so clearly affect the fellow Mexicans …who are there and who will suffer the abuse of an unjust law, who have contributed to the development and prosperity of Arizona, inexplicable without the Mexicans [Mexican politicians commonly claim that the U.S. owes its economic success to Mexican immigrants] and least of all when in this case a law is set in motion that opens the doors to an unacceptable racial discrimination."[ Gobierno Federal no permanecerá indiferente ante Ley Arizona: FCH]

But Calderon sees a silver lining:

"We know the severity of this law, SB 1070, but I also think that such an adverse circumstance has to be a spur, it has to be one more incentive to fortify and to increase the unity and organization of the Mexicans in the United States and of the Mexicans in the United States with the Mexican government."

(Emphasis added. In other words, the Mexican president is openly fomenting a Fifth Column in the U.S.)

Calderon is counting on Obama:

"We value in all of its dimension the rejection that the President of the United States himself has made to the anti-immigrant legislation of Arizona. I agree precisely with President Obama that the [Mexican and U.S.] Federal Governments have the responsibility to impel strategies that deal with the migratory phenomenon from a comprehensive perspective [a.k.a. amnesty].

Mexico’s ambassador to the U.S., Arturo Sarukhan—who has openly described the network of Mexican consulates in the U.S. as "beachheads"—called SB 1070 "racial discrimination".

According to Sarukhan in El Universal:

"Mexico will utilize all the diplomatic, political and economic resources in its reach in response to the signing of this law."

I don’t doubt that! What’s scandalous is that our government has never reprimanded this over-the-top meddling perpetrated over the years by undiplomatic Mexican diplomats.

Mexico’s foreign minister, Patricia Espinosa, said that the law "affects the relationship between Arizona and Mexico and obliges the Mexican government to consider the viability and utility of the strategies of cooperation" with Arizona.

Good! Because Arizona, as a U.S. state, is not really supposed to have a "relationship" with Mexico anyway. According to Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution: "No State shall….enter into any Agreement or Compact … with a foreign Power..."

Espinosa even had the gall to say that "the government of Mexico recognizes the sovereign right of all countries to decide public policies that should apply in its territory". Nevertheless, "criminalization is not the way to resolve the phenomenon of undocumented immigration. The existence of cross-border labor markets demand comprehensive and long-range solutions. The co-responsibility, the confidence and the mutual respect should be the base to deal with the shared challenges in North America."

North American Union, anyone?

An article reporting Espinosa’s anti-1070 stance stated that "the embassy of Mexico and the five [!] consulates of Mexico in Arizona will be redoubling their actions of assistance, consular protection and legal consultation." [Meddling]

Jose Angel Cordova, Mexico’s health secretary, called the law "abominable".

The Mexican Congress is also a hotbed of anti-Arizona rhetoric.

Senator Santiago Creel said that the law is "anti-Mexico" and that the Mexican congress would approve this week a statement to ask the U.S. government to stop the law.

Creel predicts it will be vetoed by the U.S. Supreme Court. He had a message for the Mexicans in Arizona:

"You shouldn’t feel alone, that although we are distant, we are Mexicans committed to the cause of the migrants and of our fellow Mexicans"

Luis Alberto Villarreal, chairman of the North American Foreign Relations Committee of the Mexican Senate called the law "shameful" and spoke of the importance of working "in other states [of the United States] to avoid a domino effect …today it’s Arizona but tomorrow it can be another state".

(Right on!)

The Mexican Senate had called on Governor Brewer to veto the law before she signed it.

The congressional delegation of the PRD (Partido de la Revolución Democratica) called on the governor of the state of Sonora, the Mexican state across the border from Arizona, to "avoid any commercial dealing or touristic interchange with the governor of Arizona."

Claimed the PRD’s Domingo Rodriguez: "The only way to reverse this racist and xenophobic law is pressuring commercially and economically the government and legislature of Arizona."

Carlos Navarrette, president of the Mexican Senate, blamed the law on the anti-Obama "Right", and asked Obama to annul the Arizona law

THE CNDH (Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos) is offering help to Mexicans in Arizona, 24 hours a day, and can be contacted by a toll-free telephone number (01800-715-2000) or by email (migrantes@cndh.org.mx) or on their website.
Many governors of Mexican states got into the act. Fidel Herrera, governor of Veracruz asserted:

"It is time to make a great call to the channels of Mexican diplomacy to avoid that a new error is committed such as the wall and the persecution against those who contribute to the development of the United States."

Other governors piping up included Fernando Ortega (Campeche) , Andres Granier (Tabasco) and Ulises Ruiz (Oaxaca).

Ricardo Aguilar, chief of the PRI party in the State of Mexico, called the “criminalization” of illegal immigrants "atrocious and primitive".

There’s even talk in Mexico of a boycott against Arizona. The leader of the PAN (Partido Acción Nacional) Cesar Nava, called on Mexicans to boycott visiting Arizona: "In protest of this legislation and in solidarity with our fellow Mexicans who live there and who can be unjustly detained due to this legislation."

Others talking of a boycott are Mexico’s interior secretary Fernando Gomez Mont and some Mexican congressional representatives.

I think they’re on the right track here! But if they’re really going to boycott Arizona, how about Mexico withholding its illegal workers and drug smugglers from Arizona! That’s a boycott we could all support!

Meanwhile, as Americans, we should visit Arizona and spend some tourist dollars there!

Of course, there’s nothing surprising about Mexico’s hysterical reaction to SB 1070. If we had national leaders who protected our sovereignty, it wouldn’t matter a hill of beans what Mexican leaders do or say about immigration.

But then again, if we had such leaders, SB 1070 would have never been necessary.

In the end more disturbing than Mexican mewling: the opposition from organized Hispanic pressure groups within the US.

Needless to say, the NCLR (“National Council of the Race”) which as I’ve pointed out bases its ideology on that of one-time Nazi sympathizer Jose Vasconcelos), is lambasting SB 1070. Janet Murguia, president and CEO of La Raza, said that "We will continue to work with our allies to find a solution to our broken immigration system at the federal level…."

"Broken immigration system"? How about our unenforced immigration system?

And, needless to say, MALDEF (Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund) denounced the law, and promised to "pursue all legal options to challenge" it.

MALDEF even had the gall the use the U.S. Constitution to justify its opposition:

"..Our Constitution envisions a unified nation under one federal set of immigration regulations to be adopted by Congress and implemented by the President. [The federal government has immigration regulations—it just won’t enforce them, which is why Arizona is doing this]. By rejecting that constitutional plan, Arizona’s enactment of SB 1070 is tantamount to a declaration of secession. [Oh, and “sanctuary cities” aren’t?] In response, the federal government must act to preserve our united nation by clearly stating that it will not cooperate in any way with the implementation of SB 1070—that it will not adjust or alter its immigration enforcement priorities to the detriment of other states simply to accommodate Arizona's most recent exercise in racial demagoguery."

LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens), which at one time was a patriotic assimilationist organization, is "outraged by the unconstitutional immigration law".

One of the loudest Arizona opponents of SB 1070 is MEChA alumnus Rep. Raul Grijalva [Email him], who opposes secure voter ID as a nefarious Republican plot. American Patrol has a whole archive devoted to him.

Grijalva is ready to betray his own state to defeat the law, calling the rest of the country to boycott Arizona. Speaking to a rally of thousands in Arizona, Grijalva boasted that

"We’re going to overturn this unjust and racist law, and then we’re going to overturn the power structure that created this unjust, racist law."

What "power structure"? The government of Arizona? The Constitution of the United States? The historical American nation? All of the above?

Another “American” Latino opponent of SB 1070: Eliseo Medina of the Service Employees International Union. As I’ve pointed out recently, Medina has openly stated that the reason he wants amnesty is that it will legalize millions of new leftist voters. That’s totally logical, if treasonous—what a shame the Republican Party hasn’t gotten the message.

Reading about the attacks on the Arizona law, I even ran across a new Treason Lobby group! It’s a Miami-based outfit called "Fraternidad Americana", an organization "that represents thousands of children estadunidenses whose parents have been deported".

Its Nicaraguan-born executive director is Nora Sandigo. She said that Arizona governor Jan Brewer "is reviving the mentality that Hitler had. This is incredible, draconian and we are going to see the police of Arizona exactly as the Jews saw the Nazis".

But there’s one small problem with the tired and worn-out Nazi analogy: Hitler wasn’t trying to keep the Jews from immigrating to the Third Reich. If illegal aliens would stay out of Arizona, the state would have no beef with them—now would it?

This hysterical and hypocritical attack on the people of the Grand Canyon state would not be complete without the participation of Chicago congressman Luis Gutierrez. Gutierrez is of Puerto Rican extraction, so immigration laws wouldn’t affect him anyway. But he’s long taken up the amnesty cause, presumably (and ominously) out of some sense of ethic solidarity.

Gutierrez is telling his Chicago constituents to boycott Arizona:

"Why would you want to contribute to a group of people that clearly are engaged in a discriminatory act?"

Another “American” of Puerto Rican ancestry slamming SB 1070: Evangelical leader Samuel Rodriguez of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference. (I’m an Evangelical, by the way). Rodriguez really goes over the top on his blog :

"Today, Arizona stands as the state with the most xenophobic and nativist laws in the country. We need a multi-ethnic firewall against the extremists in our nation who desire to separate us rather than bring us together. Shame on you Arizona Republicans and shame on you Senator John McCain for endorsing the legislation."

"We call upon RNC Chairman Michael Steele to condemn this new law or Hispanic Americans will read the silence as a de facto endorsement and a purview of what will come if the GOP takes over Congress in 2010. Second, we call upon Attorney General Eric Holder to review this legislation since it’s clearly a violation of constitutionally protected civil rights. If you are Hispanic in Arizona, you just became a suspect and open to police harassment. We call upon all Latinos and immigrants who are citizens in Arizona to defend their constitutionally protected rights." [VDARE.COM links added].

Another Evangelical Hispanic, William Sanchez, president of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders Legal Defense Fund , which claims to represent 30,000 evangelical churches and 300 Arizona Latino pastors, opposes the law and is getting a federal lawsuit ready. [Immigration advocacy groups to challenge Arizona law, Washington Post, April 25, 2010]

Rich Latino celebrities too, are jumping on the bandwagon. George Lopez, Eva Longoria-Parker, Jessica Alba and Ricky Martin were busy tweeting against SB 1070.

Meanwhile back in Arizona, the "Arizona Hispanic Republicans" posted a statement attacking the law. It was posted on the Somos Republicans (We are Republicans) website and was entitled "Arizona Hispanic Republicans React to SB1070 and We View It As An Attack Against Our Civil Rights". (Some of the text of the document appears to be written by a non-native speaker of English).

The conveners of the "Latino Congreso", which is an umbrella organization of over 1000 Hispanic groups, including LULAC, MALDEF and others, "issued a unanimous rebuke of the anti-immigrant bill SB1070".[National Latino Congreso Outraged by passage of Arizona Immigration Bill, Apr 22, 2010]

I could go on and on. But it’s obvious that practically every U.S.-based Hispanic organization with any influence is bashing this Arizona law.

Not all Americans of Hispanic ancestry are Open Border fanatics. But it seems that virtually all influential Hispanics, famous Hispanics, organized Hispanics, and Americans who consider it important to self-identify as Hispanics support illegal immigration—or at least oppose doing anything about it, which amounts to the same thing.

Even rich, successful Hispanics, and organized Republican Hispanics, are attacking Arizona’s attempt to protect its own people from illegal immigration.

Don’t these vocal Hispanics, insofar as they self-identify as such, betray a deep-seated resentment of our country?

Is this going to continue as the Hispanic proportion of the population continues to grow in numbers and influence?

Before we import more Hispanics, shouldn’t we reconsider if we are going to lose all control over our immigration policy?

And is it really a good idea to encourage Hispanics to think of themselves as Hispanics rather than Americans?

Have we turned our immigration policy over to the Hispanic voting bloc?

Does the historical majority of our country have any say over our future—or is it all up to La Raza now?

As Pat Buchanan says: Whose Country Is This?

The bottom line is: anybody who opposes SB 1070 is supporting illegal immigration—and the abolition of America.

These are the issue that SB 1070 is bringing into sharp relief.

Meanwhile, let’s do what we can to support the courageous leaders and citizens of the great state of Arizona.

They need our support.

Their struggle is our struggle.

American citizen Allan Wall (email him) recently moved back to the U.S.A. after many years residing in Mexico. In 2005, Allan served a tour of duty in Iraq with the Texas Army National Guard. His VDARE.COM articles are archived here;

Happy 2013

elvisnixon.com — Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:31:27 GMT

HAPPY NEW YEAR to ALL!

Deadly Double Standards: "First They Came For General Boykin .."

elvisnixon.com — Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:35:16 GMT

We are experiencing a disturbing and dangerous trend in this nation. Our elites are promoting Muslims and others of questionable loyalty to positions of authority and influence and forcing out any who dare admit to holding traditional values. The most recent and egregious example of this is the case of mass murderer and terrorist Major Nidal Hasan. Our President was very quick to defend this killer and to cry out against any "rush to judgment." Our news media propaganda machine put out story after story linking the act of a man who screamed out "allahu akbar" as he fired on US soldiers to the result of "stress" and a "wounded ego." A man like Hasan was able to rise in the ranks while openly promoting jihad, yet Christians are being systematically passed over and forced into early retirement. Something is unconstitutional, immoral and dangerous about this trend, but you hear nothing about it on CBS, NBC, or CNN.

Lieutenant General William G. Boykin was the United States Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence. He has played a role in almost every recent major American military operation, serving in Grenada, Somalia, and Iraq. General Boykin was driven from office when the liberal LA Times article revealed Boykin giving a speech about hunting down Osman Atto in Mogadishu: "He went on CNN and he laughed at us, and he said, 'They'll never get me because Allah will protect me. Allah will protect me.' Well, you know what? I knew that my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol." Boykin's remarks stirred much anger in the Muslim world, and Islamic organizations within the US were highly critical of the comments and called for his resignation, such as those from the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Newsweek carried articles calling for his resignation, while Democrats like John Kerry were quick to denounce the remarks. Leftist Rep. John Conyers and 26 supporters put forward H. RES. 419 "Condemning religiously intolerant remarks and calling on the President to clearly censure and reassign Lieutenant General Boykin." General Boykin has been the victim of Stalinist history erasure. He has become a "non-person" according to the dictates of the Hollywood Liberal establishment. Ever seen the film "Blackhawk Down"? General Boykin was the Delta Force commander of that mission. He was mysteriously omitted from the film. Nidal Hasan can show a power point presentation about beheading "infidels" and pouring hot oil down their throats but General Boykin, a genuine hero suffered calumny at the hands of Democrats. See a pattern here? T he argument could, implausibly, be made that this was an international matter and that domestically there is no second class citizenship for Christians. Consider the career of Los Angeles Police Department Assistant Chief Bob Vernon was next in line to take over after Chief Daryl Gates, but Vernon was forced to retire after 37 years on the force. Why was he not allowed to ascend to the role of chief?

Was he unqualified? The son of a 20-year LAPD veteran officer, Vernon rose through the ranks from rookie street cop, to second in command. He graduated from the University of Southern California's Managerial Policy Institute and earned an MBA from Pepperdine University.

The fact of the matter is that Bob Vernon is one of the early victims of "political correctness." He had to be eliminated because of his religion. Had he been a homosexual or a Muslim, he would have become chief, but Bob Vernon is neither. He is a Christian, and his Christianity was used by the Left as a tool to bar him from the position that he so richly deserved.

Compare his situation with the mass murderer Nidal Hasan. Major Hasan did a power point presentation at a medical conference detailing his goal of "jihad" and how to behead "infidels." After murdering 14 Americans and wounding over forty, US Army Chief Staff General Casey declared that a greater loss would be to eliminate people who fit Major Hasan's profile. "Diversity is strength," burbled the General. This is a nonsense phrase that is no longer just stupid, it is dangerous.

There is a double standard employed by the elites of our society. When it comes to career promotion a glass ceiling has been imposed on Christians and conservatives in general. To admit that you believe homosexuality is a sin, oppose abortion and assisted suicide ("end of life counseling" in Obamaspeak) is to end your opportunity for advancement. Not only will you not advance but you stand a fantastic chance of being subjected to a firestorm of unbelievable mockery and criticism. Look at Sarah Palin, look at Carrie Prejean. Had they not spoken out as conservatives, does anybody honestly believe that the filthy "Perez Hilton" character assassination would have been tolerated? If the roles had been reversed and she had used abusive language toward him or pointed out that he was obese, would that have been applauded in the pages of the NY Times and the LA Times?

What happened to Bob Vernon was the opening salvo. The response by many Christians mirrored that of the Germans living in the Wiemar Republic as characterized by Martin Neimoller"s "First they came for the Jews ..." First they canned Bob Vernon because he was a born again Christian and was caricatured as an "extremist," but I was not in line to be chief of police, so I did nothing. Now you cannot be a beauty contestant and dare to disagree unless you want to be smeared with the most vile language. Now you cannot run as a conservative Republican woman without being subject to sexist stereotypes and objectification on the cover of Newseek magazine. You will be hung in effigy in West Hollywood to the amusement of local news affiliates. Your daughter will be slandered and castigated by late night talk show host David Letterman. The feminists will simply roll their eyes and nod. You oppose their agenda, then you deserve it, they will think, sometimes out loud.

It is this hate and intolerance on a cultural level and the political agenda of the secular Left that have prompted communities of faith to create the Manhattan Declaration as a manifesto of defiance.

On March 3, 1991 a suspected drunk driver was pursued by California Highway Patrol and LAPD. That driver was Rodney King. The media broadcast of his beating by officers eventually resulted in explosive violence that left 58 people dead. Robert Vernon gives the inside story in his book L.A Justice: Lessons From The Firestorm. Now that time has passed, one can sit down and read the book away from the emotionalism and hysteria whipped up by the media, and you can see how prophetic Assistant Chief of Police Vernon's words were.

We see the fruits of the Liberal victory in the corrupt and inept regime of Mayor Antonio Villaraigoso. We see the fruits in the "sanctuary city" movement that allows violent gang members to terrorize the community. We see the poisonous fruit on the national level with cowardice that allowed terrorist Nidal Hasan to remain in his job at Fort Hood.

Read Robert Vernon's book and see for yourself. General Boykin is a professor at Hampden-Sydney College, Virginia, and author of "Never Surrender: A Soldier's Journey to the Crossroads of Faith and Freedom." Read what these men have to say and then compare it to the statements of people like Nidal Hasan, Van Jones, Kevin Jennings and Michele Obama. Ask yourself which views are truly mainstream and which are extremist. Consider how the dangerous double standards of the Left that have resulted in unnecessary evil like that perpetrated at Ft Hood.

Bold Prediction: Sun Bowl USC Victory

elvisnixon.com — Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:01:04 GMT

USC will run up 52 points to the Ramblin' Wreck of Georgia Tech's 14

Sandusky,Obama and NAMBLA: The "Gay" Agenda

elvisnixon.com — Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:00:00 GMT

Jerry Sandusky has been sentenced to decades in prison for molesting boys. Our managed media describes it as "underage boys"- as if it would be admirable had the boys been born a little earlier. Why does our media do that? When the late JOE PATERNO was forced out of Penn State after decades of excellence as the Nittany Lions Head Coach.

Why was "JoPa" fired? Because he allowed the weakest, most defenseless in our society to be exploited for the degenerate pleasure of rich and powerful homosexuals.

Sandusky is a male, and he forced young males to have sexual relations with him -- that is by definition same-sex or homo(same) sexual. Why does our media mask the fact by calling him a "pedophile"? He engaged in homosexual pederasty.

What our media is hiding from you is the fact that Paterno was simply following the PC dogma. Paterno refused to be "HOMOPHOBIC." After all, Sandusky just did what LGBT media push- same sex sodomy.

Children in kindergarten in California are now being forced to learn about homosexual "heroes." Why?

Homosexuals are using so-called anti-bullying codes to impose pro homosexual propaganda in teh classroom.

"Gays" have already lowered the age of consent in Canada to 12 years old.

Sandusky is a protected "minority" as a "gay" man.

When homosexual predators start doing this in our post-Obama military, look for cases like this to increase exponentially.

This is highly reminiscent Ft Hood jihadi Nidal Hasan. The Muslim murderer should have been removed from the Army years ago, but fear of being called "Islamophobic" lead to those in authority willfully turning a blind eye to the potential for ghastly crimes. After all "Diversity is Strength" is the mantra that our media brainwashed us to believe.

Make no mistake, Harvey Milk himself marched in San Francisco's "gay" parades along with NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association)

The fact that the homosexual Coach Sandusky was allowed to rape young boys for years and years is a statement about our society's refusal to face the facts about the "gay" agenda.

An even more horrifying possibility :

"Back in April, Pittsburgh radio host Mark Madden wrote a story revealing Penn State for much of the cover-up of Jerry Sandusky's alleged child rape that has been exposed in the past week. While it didn't raise many eyebrows back then, six months later it looks to be incredibly accurate

Madden was asked on The Dennis and Callahan Show what he believes the next piece of news will be.

What he said was twice as shocking as anything that's been released thus far.

"I hear there's a rumor that there will be a more shocking development from the Second Mile Foundation -- and hold on to your stomachs, boys, this is gross, I will use the only language I can -- that Jerry Sandusky and Second Mile were pimping out young boys to rich donors. That was being investigated by two prominent columnists even as I speak."

"My opinion is when Sandusky quit, everybody knew -- not just at Penn State," Madden added. "I think it was a very poorly kept secret about college football in general, and that is why he never coached in college football again and retired at the relatively young age of 55. [That's] young for a coach, certainly."

This is what people like Obama and his supporters are ultimately all about. The weak being exploited by the powerful.

America has forgotten: the moral law is the ONLY thing that protects the weak.

Will Mexico Defeat America?

elvisnixon.com — Fri, 28 Dec 2012 07:02:00 GMT

You cannot have avoided the current wall-to-wall Rah-Rah Main Stream Media “reporting” about how the Obama Administration is about to launch a drive to amnesty the 12-20 million illegal aliens—a.k.a. undocumented Democrats—now thought to be in the country. (Nobody knows the real number, but the experience of every single previous amnesty is that it will be larger than its proponents claim).

There’s absolutely nothing surprising about this. VDARE.com repeatedly predicted that exactly the same Amnesty drive would occur if GOP Presidential candidate Mitt Romney had been elected. Apparently unnoticed but everyone except us, he actually said in the October 16 Hofstra University “I’ll get it done. I’ll get it done. First year…” Of course, the rationale would then have been Republican-triumphalist rather than Democratic-triumphalist.

The common thread: money. The Treason Lobby—Cheap Labor addicts and their Big Labor, Big Religion, and Big Ethnic allies/ clients—always intended to finance and provide political cover for a drive for Amnesty (and if possible an increase in skilled immigration) after the 2012 Election.

It appears that not just the liberals, but all of Establishment Right —what VDARE.com calls Conservatism Inc.—will be lined up at the trough wagging their tails.

One thing has been made clear by the flagrant looting of the billion-dollar Romney campaign by parasitical campaign consultants: American politics are now in a new “Gilded Age”—the name given to the post-Civil War Era, when Robber Barons were popularly supposed to have bought the political process.

Only now the money goes to the operatives, not the politicians (who increasingly seem to be rich marks, encouraged to run and spend their fortunes by self-interested courtier-consultants).

And I include in that the “conservative” magazines. (Similarly, in 2008 a Leftist journalist confided in me that the main liberal magazines had simply been bribed to support Obama by his lavishly-funded campaign).

But note: this Amnesty drive is always referred to as “Immigration Reform.”

That’s a sign of the Treason Lobby’s underlying weakness. What it is trying to do us fantastically unpopular with ordinary Americans. So the Treason Lobby has to lie about it.

Money can’t buy you everything in politics. (Ask Mitt Romney). The Bush Amnesty drives in 2006 and 2007 were defeated by uprisings of ordinary Americans at the grass-roots. Obama was so intimidated that he shrank from bringing up Amnesty in 2009-2010, despite controlling Congress—and despite his professional Hispanic allies’ bone-headed aggressive arrogance.

Ideas have defeated the Treason Lobby before. And they can again.

But only if grass roots America is informed, armed with facts and analyses, and inspired.

VDARE.com

Goebbels Letter to Obama

elvisnixon.com — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:28:47 GMT

"...The masses are dumb, uneducated fools who can’t think for themselves. They need the government to solve their problems. They need a fascist dictatorship where one great leader chooses who will run the economy.

You are the black eagle on my coat of arms and the only negative thing I could possibly say is that you make me feel slightly inferior. ... Auf Wiedersehen und Gute Nacht!"

—Dr. Joseph Goebbels

http://takimag.com/article/dear_barack_obama_a_letter_from_joseph_goebbels_gavin_mcinnes/print#ixzz2GHYU9G4h

Leftist Jiu Jitsu

elvisnixon.com — Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:34:36 GMT

According to Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Hannah Arendt once reportedly said something along the lines of,

“One of the greatest advantages of the totalitarian elites of the twenties and thirties was to turn any statement of fact into a question of motive.”

Where Are All The Christians?

elvisnixon.com — Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:38:00 GMT

"It is a universal complaint made of government education throughout the Anglosphere that it does not teach history, civics, or literature well. All three of those things, from Sydney to New York, from Cape Town to Toronto, and from Wellington to Birmingham, shriek of Christianity. The entire wealth of British and European culture is a testament to Christianity’s truth, and all the atheists from Nietzsche to Hitchens could not between them equal its beauty—though the Nazis and communists have shown what European non-Christians in power can build. Powerful belief will motivate more than mere self-interest,....

http://takimag.com/article/where_have_all_the_christians_gone_charles_coulombe/print#ixzz2FL6hJq2k